From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 02:59:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B8AA68FFC for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 02:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B2D1AE4 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 02:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FC07C9C; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:52:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE64C4AD7; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:52:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A66E34AD6; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:52:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 11:51:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20160109.115115.720784853649304585.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Poudriere and python framework of ports From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 02:59:18 -0000 I proposed following patch to Bug 205789: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165035&action=diff The intention of my patch is to make the port always use python 3 regardless of default python version setting. On real 10.2-RELEASE environment it just works as is intended. That is: * "cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python; make install" succeeds without any error. * Both mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python itself and dependents (such as mail/py-authres or mail/py-pyspf) are build and installed as python 3 packages (py34-postfix-policyd-spf-python-1.3.2_2, py34-authres-0.800, py34-pyspf-2.0.12_3, and etc.). But on poudriere with 10.2-R jail the result is different as following: * "poudriere testport -j 102release -o mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python" fails at check-sanity phase. * Some dependents (such as mail/py-authres or mail/py-pyspf) are build as python 2 packages (py27-authres-0.800, py27-pyspf-2.0.12_3, and etc.) Then what is the cause of failure on poudriere? Is there something wrong with my patch, or is this bug of either poudriere or python framework of ports? Would someone please let me know? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA