Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 11:51:15 +0900 (JST) From: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Poudriere and python framework of ports Message-ID: <20160109.115115.720784853649304585.yasu@utahime.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I proposed following patch to Bug 205789: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165035&action=diff The intention of my patch is to make the port always use python 3 regardless of default python version setting. On real 10.2-RELEASE environment it just works as is intended. That is: * "cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python; make install" succeeds without any error. * Both mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python itself and dependents (such as mail/py-authres or mail/py-pyspf) are build and installed as python 3 packages (py34-postfix-policyd-spf-python-1.3.2_2, py34-authres-0.800, py34-pyspf-2.0.12_3, and etc.). But on poudriere with 10.2-R jail the result is different as following: * "poudriere testport -j 102release -o mail/postfix-policyd-spf-python" fails at check-sanity phase. * Some dependents (such as mail/py-authres or mail/py-pyspf) are build as python 2 packages (py27-authres-0.800, py27-pyspf-2.0.12_3, and etc.) Then what is the cause of failure on poudriere? Is there something wrong with my patch, or is this bug of either poudriere or python framework of ports? Would someone please let me know? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160109.115115.720784853649304585.yasu>