From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 13 00:00:11 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA01270
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 00:00:11 -0700
Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (icb-rich-gw.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA01209
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 23:59:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA00474 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 13:00:30 +0500
From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>
Message-Id: <199506130800.NAA00474@hq.icb.chel.su>
Subject: kvm_getprocs: KINFO_... or KERN_...
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 13:00:29 +0500 (GMT+0500)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 613       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I have found recently an inconsistence in kvm_getprocs(). Manpage says
that its arguments are KINFO_... and that required headers are 
<sys/kinfo.h> and <sys/kinfo_proc.h>. But really its arguments are named
KERN_... and header is <sys/sysctl.h>. I'm running 950210-SNAP.
This manpage is absolutely exact for BSDI and I spent some time to found
this inconsistence when compiling a program from BSDI.

So may be we need to create <sys/kinfo*> and define KINFO_* for
compatibility reasons ?

		Serge Babkin

! (babkin@hq.icb.chel.su)
! Headquarter of Joint Stock Commercial Bank "Chelindbank"
! Chelyabinsk, Russia