From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 19:48:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C9437CD80; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe43.google.com (mail-vs1-xe43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTW7T45PXz4fV4; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe43.google.com with SMTP id j188so6360204vsd.2; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:48:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1wIk44cxuFg2/xCBgg6BX78mBe5IH2uL3Il+FrK9V/8=; b=NkaJcsrbJl8El22rVNCggVsqFMoyv9dXdneH51nM8J5xeqeRTm4Sa1Oa3UkV+soGWF ubcjudoIMnuFiEm69hf3LbbOy0TLYbyg/jZSlfNIHgzRQktk6yMjUX8v/hfVy0qNsUCd 0v1cokRQW1xgyeFj37U+A7cboQ8hH1CFzqWo/AOdTOFKfi7Nw8ArysJ7+v+SKHA2Q/H8 ECs1o3WCRfU2cY/XIXcumsUH/JZfeOBxyUDTG5h2SSkdWht3SuwqDVWroYfbQ7kePwSE Emf45T0A+tmtLG5idBrYgON//ujY1jfazL+V2O1LWnAiSq+d00xw6uXsBw6f6ph6JRzk WmRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TvE2ybWuDoNujlRixWPexoZ1Fy//KTHAQ8CDGN0MyWIRHZ/Sa gizzkJJGCwACaldDU5ZBO37niv3lNT5p40+cnsX4DUXB7CU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxriUejqB8LInt6yXy/K6oVRUQ91MKJHjtBJeOlAxOuuiz1gFDHY8C421vphH0hdJvMKPGTCt35f4CYB5mbjbA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e415:: with SMTP id d21mr4620201vsf.65.1597520884380; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:48:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Nebdal Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 21:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 5 reminder + memdisk images To: Matthew Macy Cc: freebsd-current , freebsd-fs , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTW7T45PXz4fV4 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 19:48:05 -0000 On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 21:30, Matthew Macy wrote: > > > > > Hi. I have some problems downloading the amd64 image: > > > > baymax /home/djn > fetch -a > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 19% of 655 MB 2179 kBps 04m07s > > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > > truncated: 134152192/687158140 bytes > > baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 882 kBps 09m10s > > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > > truncated: 139132928/687158140 bytes > > baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz > > freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 647 kBps 12m23s > > fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be > > truncated: 142065664/687158140 bytes > > baymax /home/djn > > > > > It also fails using Firefox on windows on a different machine. (It's > > also much slower from that machine, about 200 kB/sec. I have no idea > > if that's relevant.) > > Yes, this appears to have been going on for at least the last week. > The FreeBSD infrastructure directly available to developers appears to > be unreliable for serving large files. Individuals with accounts on > freefall have been able to scp the files. It's possible that we may > just end up sharing images more widely by way of releng generated > images after commit. I'll see if there's an alternative for the last > week of the CFT. > > Cheers. > -M The instructions for building it myself seem easy enough, so it's not a problem for *me* - but I'm sure it can't hurt. :) Thanks, -- Daniel Nebdal