Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Sep 2016 05:14:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 212578] [PATCH] textproc/apache-solr Fix broken startup script
Message-ID:  <bug-212578-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212578

            Bug ID: 212578
           Summary: [PATCH] textproc/apache-solr Fix broken startup script
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Keywords: patch
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ari@ish.com.au
          Keywords: patch

Created attachment 174640
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D174640&action=
=3Dedit
new solr portfiles

I started work to get Solr to start up with a much more flexible startup rc=
.d
script, but this work grew to the point where I rebuilt the entire port. The
existing port has multiple problems including just not running since it poi=
nts
to the wrong executable.

Notable features:

1. Runs as solr user/group for better security
2. Uses superior Solr startup script which comes as part of the upstream
package
3. Doesn't install the running core application in examples folder
4. Separate examples and docs as port options


Portlint passes.

# portlint
looks fine.

Poudriere builds, tested with both the options checked and with them unchec=
ked.

pkg installed into my production server and runs. Haven't yet put it under
load, but I'm doing that this week.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212578-13>