From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 14:53:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E78316A4CE; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net (barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C49243D1D; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:53:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@usermode.org) Received: from h-68-164-88-123.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.164.88.123] helo=scatha.home) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B0799-0006zT-00; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:53:23 -0500 From: David Johnson Organization: Usermode To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:53:23 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200403071801.i27I1LOT072502@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200403071801.i27I1LOT072502@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403071453.23024.david@usermode.org> cc: fenner@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: x11-wm/qinx X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 22:53:24 -0000 On Sunday 07 March 2004 10:01 am, Bill "distfiles" Fenner wrote: > Dear david@usermode.org, > > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles [or main web pages] are not fetchable from their > MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/david@usermode.org.html > > and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with > a problem is x11-wm/qinx. Please tell me what is wrong. This is the second notice I have had of this, and there is nothing wrong with the port that I can find. The logs merely shows that the distfile was skipped. There was no error in fetching it, because it never tried to fetch it. My brain hurts! -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org