From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Apr 26 10:52:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23387 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23023; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fritcher@calweb.com) Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA15321; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) X-SMTP: helo web2.calweb.com from fritcher@calweb.com server fritcher@web2.calweb.com ip 208.131.56.52 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jason K. Fritcher" Reply-To: "Jason K. Fritcher" To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/6329 In-Reply-To: <199804260702.AAA10021@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Synopsis: _thread_flockfile hangs with NULL file pointer. > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: phk > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 26 00:02:06 PDT 1998 > State-Changed-Why: > the patch doesn't apply to -current, and I think the right > fix would be a merge from -current. How likely (or soon) is this to happen? If it isn't going to happen very soon, why not just patch -stable, and then when libc_r from -current is merged into -stable, it will take over. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason K. Fritcher Sr. Technical Support fritcher@calweb.com CalWeb Internet Services http://www.calweb.com/ 916-641-9320 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message