From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  4 13:05:47 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: standards@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6051F16A4DA
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Aug 2006 13:05:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AD443D49
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Aug 2006 13:05:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k74D5hBS005949
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:05:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k74D5hpG005948;
	Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:05:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
To: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:05:42 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200608031547.34386.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<200608031817.23847.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<20060804065629.GB89735@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
In-Reply-To: <20060804065629.GB89735@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>
X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVihy+z3/UR{6SCQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-u"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608040905.43271@aldan>
Cc: standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conundrum: _C99_SOURCE vs. sigset
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:05:47 -0000

On Friday 04 August 2006 02:56, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
= > > The macro _C99_SOURCE is for pure C99 code and _ANSI_SOURCE for C90
= > > code. Both don't include the <pthread.h> header.
= > 
= > They do -- it gets included from iostream, even when I define one of
= > those.
= 
= No, what I meant was that <pthread.h> isn't defined by neither C90 nor
= C99 but by POSIX. šDefining _C99_SOURCE or _ANSI_SOURCE hides additional
= POSIX/BSD identifiers in shared headers which is a bad idea if you want
= to include <pthread.h>; as you've seen it leads to errors.

I don't, actually, include pthread.h. iostream does -- that's the problem
:-( Thanks!

	-mi