From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Wed Nov 29 17:03:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141AE5DF79 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559CD7C108 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4480F25D3860; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A66ED1F822; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUAdns6xW9SA; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.248.102.39] (fresh-ayiya.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:f001::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3A27D1F821; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Kristof Provost" Cc: "Matthias Meyser" , freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPSEC in VNET Jails Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:17 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6098) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20A48018-1601-4AFC-95E5-AA9725E79E3D@sigsegv.be> References: <20A48018-1601-4AFC-95E5-AA9725E79E3D@sigsegv.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:24 -0000 On 29 Nov 2017, at 11:40, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 29 Nov 2017, at 12:16, Matthias Meyser wrote: >> Hi >> >> i use a IPSEC Tunnel inside a VNET jail without problems. >> >> Annoyingly /etc/rc.d/ipsec dos not run in VNET jails. >> >> This is fixed in head see >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211364 >> >> This is NOT MFCed to stable/11 because the author isn't convinced >> that VNET jails are "is sufficiently robust in stable/11 to encourage >> people to use it" >> >> As this fix only makes a difference if you >> >> 1) Have compiled a Kernel WITH VIMAGE support >> 2) Setup and configured a VNET jail. >> 3) Setup IPSEC inside the VNET jail. >> >> i think this should be MFCed. >> > I stand by my initial assessment that VNET is not sufficiently stable > in stable/11 to encourage its use there. > There are still issues with IPSec, even in head. See > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13017 for some more information on that. > Those issues are being addressed in head, but I do not expect VNET to > ever become robust in 11. Well, whether people will use it or not is their decision. If they want to give it a try I don’t see any harm why ipsec should not start. It’s a lot more likely to work than some firewalls, given I used it years ago under vnet to debug ipcomp problems. I think in order to not waste more time on this, can we just MFC the change to 11? Feel free to put in “Urged to by: bz” Thanks, /bz