Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:54:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220440] mount_smbfs fails to mount samba 4.6.5 share Message-ID: <bug-220440-3630-sASHLrynJK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220440-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220440-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220440 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Sean McBride from comment #2) You're totally correct that NTLMv1 is insecure, enabling it is a bad idea, = and that FreeBSD's kernel smbfs (mount_smbfs) only supports the insecure v1. However, kernel smbfs isn't going to grow smb2 support on the basis of a PR= -- Bugzilla just isn't a "major feature wishlist" tracking system. So morphing this bug into "please implement v2+" isn't really viable. One alternative would be to morph this into a Doc bug, where we spell out m= ore explicitly how limited smbfs support is in the mount_smbfs.8 manual page an= d/or any web documentation of the filesystem. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220440-3630-sASHLrynJK>