From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 4 11:33:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA02449 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA02444 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA12943; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606041832.LAA12943@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: gusw@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Gunther Schadow) cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940 U makes fatal bus resets! In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jun 1996 11:38:01 +0200." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 11:32:45 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >hard on it. I'm so disappointed because I never had to mistrust my BSD >kernel so much: 386BSD 0.0new had longer uptimes then I experience >today! We get the idea. Let me point out, however, that 386BSD 0.0 did not have support for the 2940. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project