Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 12:39:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de Subject: Re: disklabel (1.1.5.1), partitions Message-ID: <199501242039.MAA23769@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199501241644.IAA20509@ref.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Jan 24, 95 08:44:53 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > >2117025 1819 cyl 15 heads 77 sec > > > Does anybody have anything remotely close to a good reason for not nuking > the above printf in sd.c and always report a 32/64/X geometry ?? People using extended translation? People wanting to know what the geometry reported by the disk really is (You can get a better idea of what the max possible bandwidth of the drive is this way). If we can always determine the translated geometry correctly, then I would suggest printing that at the time the SCSI bus is attached. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> > TRW Financial Systems, Inc. > FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-) > -- Justin T. Gibbs ============================================== TCS Instructional Group - Programmer/Analyst 1 Cory | Po | Danube | Volga | Parker | Torus ==============================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501242039.MAA23769>