From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 20 07:39:48 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CD3106566B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:39:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com
	[209.85.218.216])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413D38FC1C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:39:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so5181423bwz.3
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=ldgy4NyR1caZyHxXY6+ialrsCi+VPZNMfItGIh1Cp30=;
	b=tWmul7nFPtkc2VflKN+qqLyEf46ZyQlXhXnSfdQUwjdQ6JrT/V18m6/nkQfdKF9UVs
	VGVrXBNMx0/71w2AGU6OH7jS0cmjqjWZ5vtBdJsAsXUgCGSvIKI2WrwJEM1ow+/DGs0t
	k07Dzze/nVIJjh/P/RfmAg1NEtomYmCY4bZ6s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=xio5QHfW0BwNgqt+6xryt9VlVNoXsFpr4FeVxSDLOIZI8kLKk4dAcRi7syrZF6XLW0
	RO6Scn9ZSKAhpJ5iyh7tsvlT1uOXjpnJ2arqoNrkMVvlDcM86SIs26ofwdbzam2rx8l7
	OgB2gz1iRmJPiphdTJpDwmF4mJQUuCyfiFUto=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.150.76 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <permail-20100419155822f7e55a9d00000470-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
References: <20100419122820.GA53253@freebsd.org>
	<permail-20100419155822f7e55a9d00000470-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:39:26 +0300
Received: by 10.239.183.146 with SMTP id u18mr580186hbg.174.1271749186863; 
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <x2za0777e081004200039z69fb39f8rb598e296d74ab8e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:39:49 -0000

> i was also wondering: what's the reason gcc is still being used during step
> "Building an up-to-date make(1)" and not clang?

because make segfaults when using clang ;)