Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:53:35 +0400 From: Anthony Pankov <ap00@mail.ru> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re[3]: BDB corrupt Message-ID: <394875078.20080514105335@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <482A02CD.7040308@mansionfamily.plus.com> References: <op.uavxx8ip2n4ijf@duckjen.nextgentel.no> <9FC19AC2-DAD8-418C-8B9C-F129DEC58CEF@gmail.com> <15336578.20080512123806@mail.ru> <200805121153.00809.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> <1663320218.20080512223531@mail.ru> <20080512152430.3720683e@mbook.local> <2117635718.20080513154406@mail.ru> <20080513121452.GA70860@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <20080513154137.GA28842@pix.net> <482A02CD.7040308@mansionfamily.plus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks everyone for responding. I'll use QDBM as most attractive from my point of view. Oracle BDB is to complex for my task and have drastic "free" license with unknown price for commercial use. Licensing is not a main issue for me now, but i'll beware it to be on the safe side. I think that FreeBSD (ideally) must have a few PRIMARY datastore tools which together cover most tasks and able for horizontal and vertical scaling: 1. BDB1 = QDBM 2. CDB 3. SQLite 4. Firebird 5. PostgreSQL I'm absolutely sure that tradition of programmers to write own datastore, memory list, etc has to be dropped. I think that some warning like 'may corrupt data' has to be committed to 'man db'. -- Best regards, Anthony mailto:ap00@mail.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394875078.20080514105335>