From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Aug 29 12:00:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA25002 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 12:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from insomnia.local.net (max1-41.columbus.megsinet.net [209.81.172.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA24993 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 12:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmutter@devrycols.edu) Received: from localhost (jmutter@localhost) by insomnia.local.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA16600; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 15:02:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jmutter@devrycols.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: insomnia.local.net: jmutter owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 15:02:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "James A. Mutter" Reply-To: jm7996@devrycols.edu To: rick hamell cc: Craig , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Freebsd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > All in all, FreeBSD has been for me easier to install by far. It > seems to have a lot better quality control, a better help mailing list, > and a lot more knowledgable people, and if FreeBSD worked on the lower > end SparcStations, I would have installed it in a heartbeat. NetBSD, which is also an *excellent* operating system, will run like a champion on that lower end Sparc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message