From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 7 17:08:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D5A16A468 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E385113C46C for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1397094wxd for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=XVSWnzcwSKHUsn1KSkhL/aWHbT3ecpOjY9usy+C2/ZHVkCRB0ZPbwAN31Ndqu9/Afa+sE8zzqISBiTW707+/6iP7dQFYPiNGfUUD0dxm71O573LAQjC3eUPi9hKDXmV9DSnZ/pFmhSdkPhxHWMch+/mg/WymbBhw3AME9lRPPmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=cpxiDu+UCniJjPClCfOHC73Ug2ZXpZg7XK+77pEk72PVi0++acTYjLCsePMTpXu8ZCJXTrOMgJiBNkUm+OwnX8OxBePohQKfvCZaUZTUQjyzUhoVWe7wPFBZoZ8qhK7+q83XeOnzkfIQir6ixH2pRnDPjY55j9NTVsNX4eRtGf4= Received: by 10.90.53.16 with SMTP id b16mr6269460aga.1186506538027; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q26sm8836306ele.2007.08.07.10.08.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.home.rakhesh.com (obelix.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1337611420; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:07:51 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:07:32 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: Scot Hetzel In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0708070656j77bc1f82l6c267df10e65cdfc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070807210309.B84583@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20070807160649.Y22638@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <790a9fff0708070656j77bc1f82l6c267df10e65cdfc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Sender: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building Pine with PASSFILE option X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:08:59 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: >> I used the "+=" coz I got the got the impression that adds onto the >> existing extra options. And if I want to make this permanent, can I define >> it in /etc/make.conf accordingly? >> >> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/mail/pine4} >> EXTRA_OPTS+= PASSFILE=.pine.pwd >> .endif >> > But it will work from /etc/make.conf (using either "=" or "+="), as > long as you don't select LDAP support. Oh, so if I add the above stuff to /etc/make.conf it will work? Cool. Then why won't it work by passing it to "make" on the command line? I thought stuff in /etc/make.conf got passed to the "make" command ... > A better way to add support for PASSFILE, would be to add: > > PASSFILE "Add support for a Pine Password File (DANGEROUS)" off > > to the list of options, then add the following below .if > defined(WITH_IPV6) ... .endif: > > .if defined(WITH_PASSFILE) > EXTRA_OPTS+= PASSFILE=.pine.pwd > .endif > After you make these changes and test them, submit the change using > send-pr for inclusion to the pine4 port. The maintainer will then > make the decision if this change is appropriate for the ports. That sounds like fun! I'll try it and get back if there's any problems. :) Thanks! Rakhesh