Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:26:02 -0800 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Kernel@dragonflybsd.org, tech-misc@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnma1ntnMONbbk0joMaQC5NkkEEZ2ze7uCubj%2B_DLyrrA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712150841070.35399@orthanc.ca> References: <CAF6rxgken-%2BbrO-%2BsA-eWpFMb=tfTxSpuAuesCCRA1NtaN0_zg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712150841070.35399@orthanc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 December 2017 at 08:43, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote: >> I'd like to turn this into into a dot file > Sounds like a reasonable idea. With care, the source (text) file(s) can > often be formatted in a way that's at least semi-readable. I assume this > would ship with pregenerated images (PDF, SVG) so people don't have to > install the port to render the graph? The overall consensus seems to be: so long as there is a reasonable way to view this file in plaintext without requiring a tool in base, its fine. I'll likely run with that after ironing out the conversion bit. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnma1ntnMONbbk0joMaQC5NkkEEZ2ze7uCubj%2B_DLyrrA>