From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Feb  1 16:24:44 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-131.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E1D6B37B4A5; Fri,  1 Feb 2002 16:24:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7EEE366BDC; Fri,  1 Feb 2002 16:24:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:24:23 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Yoichi NAKAYAMA <yoichi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [Q] executable search path on bento
Message-ID: <20020201162423.B16262@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <wy8zaii6vq.wl@eken5.eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <wy3d0o13tc.wl@eken7.eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <wy3d0o13tc.wl@eken7.eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp>; from yoichi@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:22:23PM +0900
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


--s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:22:23PM +0900, Yoichi NAKAYAMA wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Jan 2002 04:59:37 +0900, In freebsd-ports@ list,
> Yoichi NAKAYAMA <yoichi@eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> > When I was testing ports/34230 for ja-cannadic update,
> > a question arised. That is, what can I assume as
> > executable search path for RUN_DEPENDS?
> > Especially, I want to know what is the value of PATH
> > when bento builds packages.
>=20
> I empirically know we can assume /usr/local/bin in PATH.
> But I'm not sure about /usr/local/sbin. Can we asuume it
> in PATH on bento?

It would probably be safer to make no assumptions about the value of
$PATH and hard-code the absolute paths explicitly.

Kris
--s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8WzG3Wry0BWjoQKURArLXAJ9JCYgUplri6G6/aVPj9AOHNy9vyQCfcUk1
aIN38qRgD2Bg+TJVAhAlFRU=
=OWXp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message