From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 13 13:25:23 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7A616A4D0
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24A843F85
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:25:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net)
Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)
	by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hADLPJc22786;
	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:25:19 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:25:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
In-Reply-To: <200311130728.02722@harrymail>
Message-ID: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:25:23 -0000


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

> On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:
> >
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news@schmalzbauer.de> wrote:
> > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary
> > >> at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised me.
> > >
> > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT?  ULE was broken with these
> > > characteristics until very recently.  If you're up-to-date and still
> > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list.
> > >
> > > Kris
> >
> > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov.
> >
> > Find attached my first problem description.
>
> This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf

Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15.  Do you experience bad
interactivity without seti running?

Thanks,
Jeff

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Harry
>