From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 04:24:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587BB16A41C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgrempel@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD86243D58 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgrempel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1049247wra for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:24:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oHydMhVu+umEITmlCzSeEoxLZOwYVXYATf245MWdOZrb66PbnQTNG9SWKOZcboFWnkMV8n3wCpikn854dpNYVMlISBICD+NoCHaFjWB7Ud7msjeSL8awaw8XdK0uuJiL9d3T9BafcxwrQU4GH3oUdaTy8uxCyroE9iv09RTaIWw= Received: by 10.54.8.51 with SMTP id 51mr96550wrh; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.39.41 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 23:24:18 -0500 From: Ryan Rempel To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200507042015.18372.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200506302034.01647.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <20050702171255.756fd176@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <200507042015.18372.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> Subject: Re: Openoffice-2-devel fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ryan Rempel List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:24:48 -0000 On 7/4/05, Ian Moore wrote: > The only problem is, I built it with the -DWITH_KDE option but I don't th= ink > it's had any effect - it seems to still be using GTK dialogue boxes etc. >=20 > Is there some easy way to check that KDE support is really built into it? > I'm assuming that if it is built with KDE, when I choose File, Open, the > dialogue box should be a standard KDE one, instead of the normal GTK one? There are some patches available at ooo.ximian.com which will do this (among other things). Here's the URL: http://ooo.ximian.com/patches/src680/ The "apply" file has some information describing what each patch does (you won't want all of them).