From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 15 18:19:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D548416A4CF; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:19:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0EBF943D4C; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:19:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBFIIHqJ014991;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:18:17 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:18:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20041215.111817.71102717.imp@harmony.village.org>
To: trhodes@FreeBSD.org
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041215121453.78849773@localhost>
References: <20041215095848.658d4cc6@localhost>
	<20041215154733.GB85290@ip.net.ua>
	<20041215121453.78849773@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: ru@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:19:18 -0000

> 4: We suck because both are valid points and we need a third vote to
>    break it.

Go with the new style.

I say that because we should likely move away from having both NOFOO
and NO_FOO to only having NO_FOO, at which time we'd only have one
section.

We do need to consider also having a different name space for internal
only vs external flags as well, aka NOSHARE (which is kinda both right
now).

Warner