From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 26 23:32:28 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD49A1065686
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mahan@mahan.org)
Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC27E8FC17
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gypsy.mahan.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p7QNZ3fj045783;
	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:35:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org)
Message-ID: <4E582D0C.50100@mahan.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:32:28 -0700
From: Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
	rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
References: <4E553F29.7020101@mahan.org>
	<CAE-mSO+hF-UTq+TQaxrf7p8gggF+53Qv9ZA3ckDwOmLNsfzCBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSO+hF-UTq+TQaxrf7p8gggF+53Qv9ZA3ckDwOmLNsfzCBA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Usage of IFQ_DEQUEUE vs IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:32:28 -0000



On 8/24/11 11:42 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 22:12, Patrick Mahan <mahan@mahan.org> wrote:
>> Can somebody confirm my assumption on the following:
>>
>>  If I am supporting ALTQ in a driver, then I should use the
>>  IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE() macro.  If I am not supporting ALTQ then
>>  it is okay IFQ_DEQUEUE() macro?  If not what's the difference?
>>
>> Slightly confused...
>>
> 
> Just in case, have you read man 9 altq? It has a good description of
> these macros.
> 

Sergey,

That is exactly what I was looking for.  Don't know how I missed that
(sometimes get caught up in looking at the source)

Thanks,

Patrick