Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:40:17 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Alexey Dokuchaev" <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/glest Makefile Message-ID: <op.s22rlfm99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20060108115121.GC7570@FreeBSD.org> References: <200601022151.k02LpBte011594@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060108115121.GC7570@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -0600, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >> edwin 2006-01-02 21:51:11 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> games/glest Makefile >> Log: >> broken on 4.x, ignore on 4.x! > > I've been under impression that IGNORE should be used when software in > question builds, but fails to run properly for some reason. If it does > not build, you should mark it BROKEN. If it's inherently broken (i.e., > contains architechture-specific non-portable code) then > NOT_FOR_ARCHS/ONLY_FOR_ARCHS should be used. I submitted BROKEN, but he has changed it to IGNORE. > As a side note, IMHO if submitter has freewall login, (and mezz@ does > have it) one should use it instead of FQN in commit log. I personal don't mind both, which I careless. Cheers, Mezz > ./danfe -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.s22rlfm99aq2h7>