From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Mar 2 12:27:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B5414E58 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:27:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id NAA03504; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 13:26:57 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:26:52 -0700 To: Bill Fumerola , Adam Turoff From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <99Mar2.114516est.113920@pandora.isinet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? I still think it's an unfortunate development, though. Maybe it's possible to bring in more code from the Net or the CD after the boot, to keep the boot to one floppy. --Brett At 03:19 PM 3/2/99 -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: >On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Adam Turoff wrote: > >> FreeBSD: ++ (can be done, single-floppy install) > >This is not true anymore. > >- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - >- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message