From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 7 22:04:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E8016A403 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664E313C442 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 22:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 64581 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 22:04:22 -0000 Received: from ppp-71-139-39-138.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?10.0.5.59?) (nate-mail@71.139.39.138) by root.org with ESMTPA; 7 Jan 2007 22:04:22 -0000 Message-ID: <45A16E56.80506@root.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:04:06 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Stephane E. Potvin" References: <44874358.6050608@videotron.ca> <44876932.9000108@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <44876932.9000108@videotron.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] Support for asymetrical per-cpu Cx states X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:04:22 -0000 Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > Stephane E. Potvin wrote: >> What started as a quick check why my laptop was not giving me Cx states >> higher than C1 turned out in a major rework of the way the acpi_cpu >> driver works. >> >> The attached patch makes the following modifications to the driver: >> >> - Support for asymetrical and per-cpu Cx states. This is done by parsing >> the _CST packages for each cpu and tracking all the states individually, >> on a per-cpu basis. The patch with some modifications by me has been committed. Please cvsup, test, let me know if any problems. Thanks again for this work. -- Nate