From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 18 21:43:22 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7661065670
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6869E8FC16
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net
	[89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DC1513DF5F;
	Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:43:21 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:43:16 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <458893856.20101219004316@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20101218214003.0000154d@unknown>
References: <1701263071.20101219003441@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<20101218214003.0000154d@unknown>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Good configurable I/O benchmark?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:22 -0000

Hello, Bruce.
You wrote 19 =E4=E5=EA=E0=E1=F0=FF 2010 =E3., 0:40:03:

>>   Is here any good I/O benchmark? What do I mean by `good':
>>=20
>>  (1) Multiprocess workloads with different workloads per processe
>> (thread) (a) Sequential R or W.
>>    (b) Random R and W with configurable R:W ratio.
>>    (c) Configurable min/max/avg distance seek in random workloads.
>>  (2) All above with configurable block size.
>>  (3) All of above with configurable I/O queue depth.
> It sounds like sysutils/fio should do a lot of that.
  Thank  you.  "sysutils" is last place I would have though of looking
  at (I've looke at "benchmarks").



--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>