Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:58:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Alexander <amour@blade.elitsat.net> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: route question Message-ID: <20010712105731.V22271-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20010712173556.R2636-100000@blade.elitsat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This isn't a valid routing setup. The subnets overlap. Why not further subnet the ed1 network so that it doesn't conflict with the /28 on ed2? Joe Clarke On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Alexander wrote: > Simple question > I have a routing: > 1.2.3.226 52:54:0:e4:38:d9 UHLW 0 1297 ed1 957 > This route is added by the kernel (or something like that, I haven't added it) > and I want to add a route that has the flag "W". > > This is because of my problem. > I have network 1.2.3.0/24 on ed1 > and I have network 1.2.3.224/28 on ed2 > but 1.2.3.226 is on ed1 > and if I manually add it to ed1 > e.g. > route add -host 1.2.3.226 -iface ed1 > it sets flags "UHLS" and no "W" and the route actually is not working, I > can't ping the host or connect to it. > > If u know a solution for this problem please write me back fastly. > > > P.S. network bridge is working but it is not a solution for me. I need to > set these flags > > thanks > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010712105731.V22271-100000>