From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 16 10:01:19 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A4E106564A;
	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7071C14DDD9;
	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:01:18 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5003E66D.10907@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 03:01:17 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jase Thew <jase@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201207160642.q6G6gosx011944@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20120716064950.GB94880@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
	<5003E543.1060005@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5003E543.1060005@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>,
	Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r300924 - head/www/lighttpd
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:01:19 -0000

On 07/16/2012 02:56, Jase Thew wrote:
> On 16/07/2012 07:49, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 
>>> +OPENLDAP_DESC=	LDAP support
>>
>> Won't that make sense to use the LDAP knobs here? which aleady exists?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> BApt
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Wouldn't changing the option name mean that any saved configuration that
> users have for that particular option (OPENLDAP in lighttpd) gets
> forgotten? I don't think this is a good idea unless absolutely necessary.

Simple, put a compat shim in the port to handle the old option.


-- 

    Change is hard.