Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:59:13 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, mdf@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228625 - head/usr.bin/csup Message-ID: <398125AD-ECC7-42EB-8050-BAEC6F444F1C@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <E64E9703-3032-4AFA-BAA4-BC4552AFC3C7@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <201112171314.pBHDEjtQ060509@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm9cBbCxZ9MvgPvKgYfSxPSpeofgTq0NnJo=e3tR5idxEQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EED0F99.2020306@FreeBSD.org> <E64E9703-3032-4AFA-BAA4-BC4552AFC3C7@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17. Dec 2011, at 21:56 , Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >=20 > On 17. Dec 2011, at 21:54 , Dimitry Andric wrote: >=20 >> On 2011-12-17 22:32, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> ... >>>> In usr.bin/csup/auth.c, use the correct number of bytes for zeroing = the >>>> shared secret, and use long long format to snprintf a time_t. >>> If casting is necessary, style prefers intmax_t or uintmax_t, since >>> those are always wide enough. >>=20 >> I don't see anything about that in style(9), maybe it should be added >> then? In any case, I only changed the %ld format to %lld, because >> time_t is int, long or long long depending on arch. Long long is = just >> the widest type required in this case. >=20 > time_t is not always int. See sparc64. gnargh, sorry. But yes we prefer a well defined type to a type that is = different per arch. %lld has constantly been a printf problem in the past. /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?398125AD-ECC7-42EB-8050-BAEC6F444F1C>