From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  6 18:55:51 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7F7F93;
 Fri,  6 Dec 2013 18:55:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x232.google.com (mail-qc0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::232])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6AD16DD;
 Fri,  6 Dec 2013 18:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i17so777339qcy.23
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:55:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=3l1C87u0WdF21g9WeADKSTbDtyluhKpc8GKVscBx2YI=;
 b=JW4H99UN2yZT5ZzMa6FunRgm378rEq8w3rID3fz0r0Prcr0k2f3BoC8LrBfqOAkMdp
 21vU5fyNXQZQHz/UPEoi552nWVRpCrYVlsLESdyP9AjvB/isB1XF/j6Xz9xt7OM8c7nw
 FeJr1Ent/H5NCUbXqUvYJYVU/H2K2XI8YXmaSVQgqdMjxhrP8lAg73etApf8zstvLZng
 MxiC91JU4jV3158mFKucLqd8l/ZGTkKzLMT+7RinLc9N+NyEGdWA8tCG5Pn2iAAKOtXk
 3PS+BPIKDHMSFw3pAUpT6ETMwE3XbaqRq4ze9U7dNc8MmvDMLgpYnL5UcXYn4QQ0e7fh
 HPZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.129.38 with SMTP id nt6mr1192469qeb.78.1386356149910;
 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.53.200 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:55:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A21AE9.5020803@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CAGm6yaTEFECTYVb94A13TaXMPSLtKLpTbw4iNdgd8SuNF1QDaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Vmokrchy4pXLvZ21sCV09fQUdYKeUYCEH1U1NdfDBxhyJQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5295A261.2060403@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAGm6yaRAPoiVXuv3HgvJCHBTUYGokLyRLb_n0MQEyRp+cJUrqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGm6yaRRcS1e5b_uo4wq=ArSMxFuuTkrKTgOTcQC9nbLnYi6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <529F4409.9080403@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAGm6yaRFQZ69gQ_Jv0JG5-ru=XtROV5mz7kONC46LRYoe1XTVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonJg-Lsbijc1PnqKt+AfmjLxkQpXbKQ4R90bWq7QoXkJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGm6yaT=6b6AxDxgivP1jUBmNG1Ynrh58tvhhtZ-qW+MKpbj3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGm6yaSQBVXEQ=8NNLjQ0-1q5jxpBeQT2GCUhhCa4_qqiPX=pQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <52A1B869.6080407@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAJ-VmokdyubZLWfp7jub6LqCT+Zwx0bO4vL6_G3L7CNngcYkQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <52A21AE9.5020803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:55:49 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HFSkbB2_wwk3pvm91O6pYWsP7gE
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomRfSG7rXxKMEummRWET1bn_JZ=E7uG-Q1n-_H5NB-r5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 9.1 callout behavior
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Bret Ketchum <bcketchum@gmail.com>,
 "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:55:51 -0000

Remember that I have such similar stupid behaviour with my three year
old Atom laptop. I promise I'll bring it along to the next freebsd
event you're at. :P


-adrian

On 6 December 2013 10:43, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 06.12.2013 20:35, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> On 6 December 2013 03:43, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06.12.2013 13:41, Bret Ketchum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       Any luck in recreating?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope. I've tried with and without deep C-states enabled and still no any
>>> error messages on console.
>>
>>
>> Are you trying it with the exact same hardware?
>
>
> No. We found that while both of my test machines active now has C-state
> invariant LAPIC, at least one of Bret's is not. But that doesn't really
> explain much because C-states there are not visually enabled either by OS,
> or via C1E by BIOS.
>
>
>> For both of you - is HT on/off?
>
>
> Both if my systems have HTT active.
>
> --
> Alexander Motin