From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 04:22:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57C916A4CE; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 04:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (s142-179-111-232.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD9A43D1F; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 04:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j124LUgo093297; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:21:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j124LRiv093294; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:21:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16896.21831.300289.644962@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:21:27 -0800 To: Tim Erlin In-Reply-To: <41FE9420.3080806@filn.net> References: <41FE7592.9070305@freebsd.org> <3f8e4a7a7af495009ace9a59c728a74a@mac.com> <41FE7B67.5070906@freebsd.org> <200501311306.41445.andrewgould@datawok.com> <41FE9420.3080806@filn.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca cc: "Andrew L. Gould" cc: Mark Ovens cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache+SSL, which port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 04:22:01 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:25:04 -0600, >>>>> Tim Erlin said: > Andrew L. Gould wrote: >> Not necessarily. I've heard lots of complaints about PHP and Apache2 >> not "playing nice". (Does anyone have any updates on this situation?) > I've been running apache2 with squirrelmail for a while. The biggest > problems were performance issues. Squirrelmail was very slow pulling > mail from the disk. Not sure that apache13 would help there. I too have been using apache2 + SSL with SquirrelMail. I have had no problems --- performance or otherwise. Are you sure that your performance issues are really a PHP issue and not a problem with your IMAP server? Do you see the same problems if you use a different IMAP client? ...Sandy