From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Oct 4 14:40:12 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0644D10ACD52; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE727183D; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A3C634C48; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:40:11 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Linimon Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers Message-ID: <20181004144011.GA70537@FreeBSD.org> References: <20181003210516.GA71565@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20181004084411.GA50348@FreeBSD.org> <20181004142644.GA17270@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181004142644.GA17270@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:40:12 -0000 On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:26:44PM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:44:11AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > OK I guess I can understand removing 10 (I personally haven't seen > > one in a very long time) but 100 are omnipresent and most of my NICs > > are in fact 100. > > Sigh. If you really plan to still be using i386 and 10/100 ether in > 2024, perhaps you should consider NetBSD. I don't quite understand why are you grouping 10/100 vs. 1000 rather than 10 vs. 100/1000. ./danfe