From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 29 01:36:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8021065675; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@wasikowski.net) Received: from bijou.wasikowski.net (bijou.wasikowski.net [IPv6:2001:808:10f::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A1B8FC0A; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bijou.wasikowski.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bijou.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDBB5C081; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:36:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wasikowski.net Received: from bijou.wasikowski.net ([127.0.0.1]) by bijou.wasikowski.net (bijou.wasikowski.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMbHHN2SI8Dw; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:36:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.168.2] (leeloo.unixgroup.pl [62.121.126.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bijou.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63EC15C063; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:36:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EFBC407.3020007@wasikowski.net> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:36:07 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4ED8C0F1.807@FreeBSD.org> <20111202195555.GD1913@azathoth.lan> <4ED95A95.9040805@FreeBSD.org> <20111209211848.GF59666@azathoth.lan> <4EE27CC5.4010006@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EE27CC5.4010006@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Andriy Gapon , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: again, ports that stop daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:36:25 -0000 W dniu 2011-12-09 22:25, Doug Barton pisze: > I previously described what I thought was a pretty good way to handle > this question that addressed the needs expressed by all of the posters > on the previous thread, but my suggestion didn't get any responses. > Since this has come up again, it would be helpful (to me at least) if > people would think about my idea, and if nothing else tell me why I'm > wrong. :) +1 to the idea. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski