From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  6 08:00:09 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1935237B401
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Jun 2003 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B1943F75
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Jun 2003 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56F08Up085863
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h56F08it085862;
	Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200306061500.h56F08it085862@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
Subject: Re: ports/52479: Update port: print/ghostscript-afpl
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 15:00:09 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/52479; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc: mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com
Subject: Re: ports/52479: Update port: print/ghostscript-afpl
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 23:56:54 +0900

 On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 23:27:23 -0400
 Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
 
 > Interesting... But from reading it, it seems you are overly cautious.
 > The 8.10 fixes a security hole, while the possible disadvantages are
 > only in the rendering. Yet the new features make it a very desirable
 > upgrade -- the JBIG2 support. I think, we should upgrade (I think I have
 > a working version, in fact) -- can you ask for the opinion on ports@ ?
 > Thank you!
 
 Well, I suppose most people feel anxious if following
 message is displayed when running the program:
 
 % /usr/tmp/bin/gs -h
 AFPL Ghostscript BETA RELEASE 8.10 (2003-05-21)
 Copyright (C) 2003 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA.  All rights reserved.
 Usage: gs [switches] [file1.ps file2.ps ...]
 
 And then, it's sure that the next non-beta version will be released
 soon. We don't have to be in a hurry.