From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 10 07:30:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA10341 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA10201 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA18595; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:29:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Eivind Eklund cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone running the linux emulation as an LKM under 2.2-stable? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 16:22:58 +0200." <19980610162258.38342@follo.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 07:29:52 -0700 Message-ID: <18591.897488992@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I've seen reports of this after the signal-patches went in. However, > I've not yet seen anybody be screwed if they had a correctly installed > machine (ie, all of the cases were resolvable). > > If the kernel and the LKM need to be in sync WRT those patches, it > should AFAIK be fine. Nope, these LKM's are absolutely in-sync I'm quite sure (I've cleaned the source and obj trees with scouring powder and rebuilt from the latest cvsup'd bits, no joy :( ). So, can I infer from this that there are people who are _currently_ using the Linux LKM, do not compile their kernels with COMPAT_LINUX, and things are just fine with them in 2.2-stable? I'd just like to have this confirmed by *one* person since the LKM used to work fine for me too, up until about a week or two ago. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message