From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jul 8 5:43:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.root-servers.ch (alpha.root-servers.ch [195.49.62.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94AB037B9F8 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 05:43:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch) Received: (qmail 21636 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 12:43:06 -0000 Received: from client99-59.hispeed.ch (62.2.99.59) by ns1.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 12:43:06 -0000 Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 14:43:47 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.44) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <179162571635.20000708144347@buz.ch> To: "R.I.Pienaar" Cc: Jason Fesler , Luigi Rizzo , Chris Shenton , Alan Batie , Subject: Re[2]: load balancing In-reply-To: <20000708112606.G10253@pinetec.co.za> References: <11591545084.20000707190001@buz.ch> <20000708112606.G10253@pinetec.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello R.I.Pienaar, Saturday, July 08, 2000, 11:26:06 AM, you wrote: > this ofcource leave you with a nat box again to failover. That's exactly where the whole problem lies (well, I didn't intend to use real NAT but just some forwarding rules...)... I think I'll modify two boxes so they can reset eachother and leave them without any remote control services. Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message