From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug  6 17:58:10 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id D4F8116A421; Sat,  6 Aug 2005 17:58:10 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:58:10 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20050806175810.GA95179@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200508061031.j76AVR6P072556@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050806160155.GA3944@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<42F4E3AF.8000001@samsco.org>
	<20050806170813.GA36888@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050806170813.GA36888@xor.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>,
	src-committers@FreeBSD.org, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:58:11 -0000

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:08:13PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:22:07AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > 
> > Actually, he has fixed a number of panics in ULE in the last week.  I
> > agree with turning ULE back on by default in order to get more exposure,
> > but I would rather it have happened after 6.0-R so that we could
> > concentrate on the release.  David, would you mind reverting this until
> > after 6.0-R?  Thanks,
> 
> In the meantime I'd be happy to run ULE on some package build machines
> to test, but I think you should also ask the many people who reported
> other problems with ULE (e.g. panics on SMP, problems with priorities,
> interactive performance and general performance) to re-test and see if
> their problems persist.

Problem with dnec described by you here [1] still persists: I need to
shut down dnetc in order to be able to play UT2004 without constant
lagging.  :-(

./danfe

[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-July/006772.html