Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 22:20:05 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: chad@anasazi.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stable migration path Message-ID: <l03010d01af2edcff3af6@[208.2.87.3]> In-Reply-To: <9702180219.AA02973@chad.anasazi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I've got a couple of machines here that are using SUP to track the >stable world (and now call themselves 2.1.7). I just loaded up another >one with 2.2-GAMMA. Should it track the -current tree? > >What will be the migration plan as -stable becomes 2.2 and -current >becomes 3.0? I hope that they will create 2.1 and 2.2 targets so that you can switch to those long before "stable" changes. That way, YOU will have control over the time that you switch. After all, that 2.2 machine won't be changing just because someone decides to bless 2.2 and call it "stable". "current" will always basically be un-numbered because 3.0 has not been split off of the trunk yet. And when it does, "current" will become 3.1 or 4.0 or whatever.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010d01af2edcff3af6>