Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Sep 2004 02:52:11 +0900 (JST)
From:      Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To:        rwatson@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        nork@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ping6 -f panic with mpsafenet=1
Message-ID:  <200408311752.i7VHqB6B009470@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
In-Reply-To: <200408311744.i7VHiEWl009249@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
References:  <200408301502.i7UF2L7f030909@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040830224045.30366C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <200408311744.i7VHiEWl009249@sakura.ninth-nine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 02:44:14 +0900 (JST)
Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > > 	I contacted a panic on current with debug.mpsafenet=1.
> > > > - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > > # ping6 -f othermachine
> > > (snip)
> > > 	INET6 with FAST_IPSEC will contact panic.  But INET6 with
> > > 	KAME_IPSEC is safe, because forced disable mpsafenet on boot.
> > Do you get a panic with INET6 and FAST_IPSEC yet with mpsafenet disabled?
> 	Yes, I confirmed that INET6 and FAST_IPSEC with debug.mpsafenet=0
	~~~ Oops "No"
> 	doesn't causes panic.

Pointed out by:	hrs



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408311752.i7VHqB6B009470>