Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:51:16 -0400
From:      Tom Limoncelli <tal@lumeta.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: When is FreeBSD going to work properly with KVM switches?
Message-ID:  <3D35BCA3.4C1673FB@lumeta.com>
References:  <200207152335.g6FNZwj83570@kpt-c-24-159-35-85.chartertn.net> <20020716100741.A39217@ei.bzerk.org> <3D342883.5090600@lumeta.com> <1026829866.56263.5.camel@daemon.velosystems.net> <20020716164618.A40753@ei.bzerk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruben de Groot wrote:

> The reason there's a flag in the GENERIC kernel to only try the
> keyboard once on boot-up has something to do with trying to make the
> GENERIC kernel as generic as possible (so when a check for PS/2 keyboard
> fails, for example, it will continue to look for other keyboards, like
> USB). At least, that's what I'm told.

A general solution would be extremely useful for sites (like mine) that
can't guarantee that a keyboard will be there when the host reboots.

Is the serial port assumed to be the console if all the keyboard tests
(legacy, USB, etc.) fail?  If so, then a better flag would be a global, "If
no keyboard(s) are found, should I use the serial port as the
console?"-flag.  Settinng this flag to "no" would re-check for physical
keyboards now and then.

--Tom



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D35BCA3.4C1673FB>