From nobody Fri Oct 17 06:18:24 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cnvlZ0Xsjz6CjC2; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cnvlY6wFzz3Wpl; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760681914; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=px1KExPqG7mzkOm6XglqYHaeP26Y76OHtJcTL3a8E5I=; b=D80pZkexwwUZq7I+B1CjbP+H8l2Ck4pwgac0f7Uaay3jmaA9wm6GDyvhieyf4FC0eIyy+I 6urFsEaC4o3NuPSVVVWQvKdSdKKLQ+V+1LMIJocmSNPQB9A86+KqfIx7HxL/nPw4H31C0G 1DH0nPKoZQfLUXDCX1CCGDNN0Nk9BEJCBMFZbkr2rdtxySHi85MUhklNq6AJ0yfq7Rkw9X pVMEKSGoXVnikucvfECJu3JFs4ufDVYInAfY0oNIBTCI7A2SDit4FdQXcYFVd813MD2jFr Ee59oMNeRgmvRxxyys1WcBNQJf/iTIpswVru6kZN7FvlMsRMTRYtJDpQIJFu3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760681914; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=px1KExPqG7mzkOm6XglqYHaeP26Y76OHtJcTL3a8E5I=; b=f26d9CrfU5N90zvCzyUGgNIF3pqtBIL7Bl+VrSgwTwG2j1Kb2ZgcZLtnRqgAEX3Z5gKbtA V5Cn8vPJwYuMO9UV51jeAP07BYMQwyxXRYyjiDKrRY3Bugs1DJtt5V/65+Ryt6G+1Vq/QO OfyhZiwDgaEmhWcJ1bkNH4iX800ohZEr6nLOANFMwz9ygianzM/+6iX0Pp4e5scs7XjHDL a5wIqdsZk1s0jlR2pi9wqwAKKRwY+Owzs4rjp9ZUVwn9XTaRsYktJBRcA6kzu0sEPGixUL 2npWLzuduOZ1klqwJhEMpvVwqQdVOEPC/ZRLfLfNBsfSQdZFHvnhOs4dybxoSw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1760681914; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=F1tr6pbQwBCqZIlFYpBns/DWMdFYpYFhGzF/yOXiVcoPFQVciCCFIMspLSg2mcHcKCZoeK LgbRhZ/qPctXbkLhLmrkspncjC2wY+N8ZzZJoUbLOS0Reitz5WAmgNOwIcBqCL8o5+GAAF qgbJC5wYEcdmENVek+gTHbvRsz1W/R9RQQYilykFLfhT0Mwc8gGhDdvUcVyIQiuZBe3E/7 DhXualTq9Bjno1W+KWtT+cnOlwqdny1ZsP+lbe19UrVTrflXzDKxkNXvsPbPopqSDtDihO ZSvRC98RqjzRFinDgxVE43gD6DBf/ZwgMM2jFft0xsHbY1+uEC9/S9vt2FKPYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cnvlY3GN6z5dh; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:18:24 +0100 From: Lexi Winter To: polyduekes@proton.me Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-set-src package is marked as vital? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: polyduekes@proton.me, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <5d1e6469-bf34-4407-a84f-c46bdb827312@gmail.com> List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fg+ghEAvchr0YITA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --fg+ghEAvchr0YITA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline polyduekes@proton.me wrote in : > i would like to report it but I wanted to gather opinions on the > matter of FreeBSD-set-src being marked as vital first all sets are marked as vital to avoid issues with pkg autoremove, and i don't see any particular reason to change this for set-src specifically. the issue when attempting to remove a package which is part of a set is already tracked here: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/2517. this is supposed to be fixed for 15.0-RELEASE, although i'm not sure if anyone is actually working on it. in any case, this affects all sets, not just set-src, so removing the vital flag from set-src wouldn't fix the problem. --fg+ghEAvchr0YITA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaPHfrAAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YPxyAQCXNl8RK88I/BK90FGQnoerz1k1j7iWVPi6gFeG0W+QiAD+LHApfR+/95GO 3A8BGyTGmOwmD+om0BIbc6uE3xIHFgI= =0RgK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fg+ghEAvchr0YITA--