Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 09:43:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> To: Eric Hake <eric@clean.net> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stupid Subnet Question... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981010093943.5164D-100000@java.dpcsys.com> In-Reply-To: <199810100918.CAA02782@support.centercomp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Eric Hake wrote:
> I have a HP Switch (224T), and I have an IP block that I have subnetted as
> follows:
>
> 10.10.138.192, netmask 255.255.255.240
> 10.10.138.208, netmask 255.255.255.240
> 10.10.138.224, netmask 255.255.255.224
Since a switch isn't a router you're probably best off just using
10.10.138.192, netmask 255.255.255.192
for your network.
If you need the subnets, make the "real" IP address of the virtual
host server come out of the 10.10.138.208/28 network and add the
other IPs as aliases. Then, on the cisco add a route for the
second subnet pointing at the virtual server host.
Dan
--
Dan Busarow 949 443 4172
Dana Point Communications, a California corporation dan@dpcsys.com
Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981010093943.5164D-100000>