From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 22 8:58:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from aes.thinksec.com (aes.thinksec.com [193.212.248.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000E837B722 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:58:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@thinksec.com) Received: (from des@localhost) by aes.thinksec.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2MGvAE20721; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:57:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@thinksec.com) X-Authentication-Warning: aes.thinksec.com: des set sender to des@thinksec.com using -f X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ To: Cc: Marc Rogers , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DoS attack - advice needed References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 22 Mar 2001 17:57:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: 's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:29:36 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org writes: > Do *NOT* block ICMP point blank at ALL. If you need to filter certain > type's and code's, fine. But NEVER slap an embargo on the entire ICMP > protocol. The mentality to do this blows me away every time I hear it > uttered from people. You can get away with blocking all ICMP traffic except types 0, 3, 8 and 11 (and optionally placing restrictions on 0 and 8). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@thinksec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message