From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Oct 14 22:29:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B1D142408 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (phouka1.phouka.net [107.170.196.116]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "phouka.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sYCS3RVnz41Qn; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9EMSXo3013808 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:28:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9EMSXag013807; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:28:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from warlock) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:28:33 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: Jan Beich Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sway-1.2_1 crashes Message-ID: <20191014222833.GA13723@phouka1.phouka.net> References: <20191007165337.GA85696@phouka1.phouka.net> <20191007232340.GB85696@phouka1.phouka.net> <20191008172007.GA89365@phouka1.phouka.net> <20191011082409.2swof5muimfpwz5w@pamparam> <20191011174059.GE46984@phouka1.phouka.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46sYCS3RVnz41Qn X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of warlock@phouka1.phouka.net has no SPF policy when checking 107.170.196.116) smtp.mailfrom=warlock@phouka1.phouka.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.05 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[phouka.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.78)[0.783,0]; IP_SCORE(0.36)[ipnet: 107.170.192.0/18(0.13), asn: 14061(1.71), country: US(-0.05)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.71)[0.707,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:107.170.192.0/18, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[warlock@phouka.net,warlock@phouka1.phouka.net]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:29:57 -0000 On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:51:14AM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > John Kennedy writes: > > ... Jan's link eventually leads to this: > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/a7c3fd3d428e > > That didn't land in the mainline. I've used a commit from Greg's repo[1] > (frequently rebased) to save time on testing. GitHub allows referencing > commits from any fork, so one has to pay attention to tags and branches > a commit exists in. Using the original repo instead of a fork allows to > reference a commit even if the fork is removed or renamed but if the > commit is orphaned for prolonged time it maybe garbage-collected. > > -- > [1] https://github.com/myfreeweb/freebsd-ports-dank/commits/lite > A lot of stuff have been submitted on bugzilla but not everything. Well, I knew it didn't end up in the mainline, I just couldn't figure out where it was. I learned a few more poudriere tricks, but I patched my local git ports tree with that patch. That certainly seems to fix the VT problem. Is there any reason it hasn't been pushed out? It made ~43 of my ports recompile, but it also seems like it's been out there a while. For all the compiling I do from ports, I haven't dug into that process.