From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 19 17:58:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5C8A34; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E6B146F; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B51CFB97F; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:58:43 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: svn commit: r251886 - in head: contrib/apr contrib/apr-util contrib/serf contrib/sqlite3 contrib/subversion share/mk usr.bin usr.bin/svn usr.bin/svn/lib usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr usr.bin/svn/lib/libap... Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:13:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p25; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201306180253.r5I2rj45053959@svn.freebsd.org> <11DA3D8A-AD20-4DE1-B807-D09814F61947@bsdimp.com> <51C1C7BD.9060201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51C1C7BD.9060201@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306191113.29703.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:58:43 -0400 (EDT) Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , Peter Wemm , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Warner Losh X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:58:47 -0000 On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:01:17 am Tijl Coosemans wrote: > I'm also not convinced svnup in base would be good, because it still > pulls src directly from svn and that would not be the case with a > portsnap-like tool. With portsnap code distribution is separated from > the underlying vcs. portsnap does not work for src. (I thought we had already covered that in earlier threads?) portsnap only moves forward. It is a very important feature for our users that whatever tool they use for source updating be bidirectional. In particular it is very common practice to use a bisect operation to isolate changes responsible for regressions. -- John Baldwin