From owner-freebsd-security Sat Feb 15 12:08:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA11398 for security-outgoing; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 12:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA11390 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 12:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from hell.gigo.com (jfesler@hell.gigo.com [207.173.133.59]) by mail.calweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA22882; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 12:07:25 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970215120859.006d5a78@pop.calweb.com> X-Sender: jfesler@pop.calweb.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 12:09:17 -0800 To: Guido van Rooij , sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) From: Jason Fesler Subject: Re: blowfish passwords in FreeBSD Cc: phk@critter.dk.tfs.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 08:31 PM 2/15/97 +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: >Sean Eric Fagan wrote: >> >> In other words, MD5 and buffer overflow patches are now as exportable as RSA >> -- namely, not without a license from the gov't. >> > >If that is true, it's time to set up the main repository in other country >with less brain-damaged governments. As an american who is stuck wiht this gov't, I'd agree. I know if I had any hot ideas that required encryption, I'd move out of the country before developing the product :(. The USA gov't doesn't seem to have a clue on what it governs.. :(