From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 5 21:48:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8148337B408 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:48:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f562h0V01624; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:43:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200106060243.f562h0V01624@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: j mckitrick Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: newbussifying drivers In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Jun 2001 03:14:04 BST." <20010606031403.A1849@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 19:42:59 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > | You manually set the correct I/O port in the hints file and then you > | don't have to check for each port between 0x200 and 0x3a0. > | > | Just bus_alloc_resource once and test for the card. > > So without having the card for testing, i should just wrap the port access > calls into bus_xxx calls? You should not even consider doing this without either a card for testing or a group of willing testers. Regards, Mike -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message