From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jul 8 9:52:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266B637BFBE; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 09:52:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04501; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 10:52:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000708104548.051b8100@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 10:52:13 -0600 To: Bill Fumerola , Ignacio Cristerna From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: No port of Opera? (Was: ((FreeBSD : Linux) :: (OS/2 : Windows))) Cc: Frank Pawlak , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20000708002457.F4034@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000707004910.046d9ab0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill, if you really believe that insisting upon native ports is an "FSF-like" tactic, you clearly have no sense of how to do advocacy, nor do you fathom the nastiness of the FSF. --Brett Glass At 10:24 PM 7/7/2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: >We'd all like more native ports, no-one disagrees with that. > >We just see different ways of getting them. Please don't say you >are "with Brett" unless you agree with his FSF-like tactics[1] as well. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message