From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 29 12:37:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E5AC116A4BF; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6426843FD7; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7TJbFBU015881;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:37:25 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:14:17 PDT."
             <20030829121043.K43708@root.org> 
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:37:15 +0200
Message-ID: <15880.1062185835@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/sbin
	Makefile src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.sbin Makefile 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:37:28 -0000

In message <20030829121043.K43708@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes:

>Hmm, missed it also.  In general I'm in favor of this but would prefer to
>see these also defined under a single knob (MINIMAL?).  I agree with
>Warner though that this may be harder than it looks in the long run, since
>I just thought of various combinations.  Before we get too many NO_*,
>perhaps people who are actually building commercial and personal small
>distributions could share some of their needs and experiences.

For what I'm doing right now, I include practically all NO* options
because the minimal functionality needed is just a firewall.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.