From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 08:26:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA4310656C7 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018668FC0C for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A57490.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.116.144]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BEB2E2D9; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4560D7700F; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:26:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1207902378; bh=jYPVji7ul3ev6vLkk3CDfRaW8VESDhObk fg7OXv9aFk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=csoAlba3NAjGx5Hj8/jNOVnbaFOSAEqKRqXHfJODuVEKclKX7dAEfWZMEvHOTs6Kf jwBLIQLxAtLBjvIBQBAGihuvff7fbLy5MQmZoyjjKY+0sFBycyH7P4oFHtspk4TJ/U1 CGgKtVE5b/6EJaLJx0ul7cnkEJDb0WAAKo/H6oZ/10zie5TGPmWdolm8bcEhnWW5DbK VZtQe5M9BbPQ5O8YWZ74B2ohtomnujpCjkbV9+qiMHHu6XvfD3+BcOIhkUzdsCKfG4S 3vQJmWH00r1jEqmEt5mvsx4QCRk00QrDnpPM4X4wEi6F8+ZqWBBkFUEpMILKJQ9w6FA YKxeD+Ttw== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id m3B8QHqd042008; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:26:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20080411102617.14135enja01ozeo0@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:26:17 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Boris Samorodov References: <200804090052.10898.aline@riseup.net> <200804091752.57284.aline@riseup.net> <62101822@bb.ipt.ru> <200804101126.11075.aline@riseup.net> <53131614@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <53131614@bb.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.2-RC2) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-13.504, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 1.40, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:26:28 -0000 Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:35:13 +0400)= : > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:26:07 -0300 Aline de Freitas wrote: > >> I was looking in the old linux-fontconfig port, and realize that there is= a >> custom fonts.conf in the files dir. So, sure, that was the trick. =20 >> Then, I've put >> this stuff in the new linux-f8-fontconfig, and yes, it works! > > Good news, thanks! I'll take care of it later (tomorrow?). AFAIR the reason for the fonts.conf in there was, that the updated =20 native fontconfig was incompatible for the config file with the linux =20 one. The goal is that the linux fontconfig uses the native fontconfig =20 configuration. We need to investigate this further. Maybe the versions =20 are still incompatible. Note, if you run fc-cache, I think this will create some files in the =20 directories where the fonts are. This should not be done with the =20 linux version of fc-cache, as this will overwrite the files from the =20 native fc-config run. Ideally they should be compatible, but I prefer =20 if the fc-cache runs is done by the font ports, not by the =20 linux-fontconfig ports. I don't think it is a good idea that the linux =20 ports influence the native ports. Bottom line: I don't think it is as easy as the patch suggests. There =20 needs to be some more investigation (Does linux fontconfig fall =20 through to the right file for the native fontconfig configuration? Are =20 they compatible? ...). Bye, Alexander. --=20 Somewhere in Tenafly, New Jersey, a chiropractor is viewing "Leave it to Beaver"! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137